Location,TX 10011,USA

Phil Ivey Eyes Healthcare Marijuana Biz for Newest Partnership

Phil Ivey Eyes Healthcare Marijuana Biz for Newest Partnership

Poker superstar Phil Ivey has received approval that is preliminary a nevada medical marijuana dispensary license in Nevada.

Phil Ivey isn’t smoking something, but his future clients may be: Ivey received one of 26 preliminary license approvals for a medical cannabis dispensary from the Las Vegas City Council previously this week, potentially making the poker superstar among the first operators into the town to supply pot to consumers.

You can find still further steps necessary before Ivey gets approval that is final start such a company, but his approval does suggest that the city found him qualified to go on in the licensing process.

About 50 potential operators went before the City Council this week to plead their cases for medical marijuana licenses. Those that got approval that is preliminary the city will now have to be approved by the state health department.

The City Council will fundamentally hold a last suitability conference for people approved by the state before awarding a limited number of licenses which have been set aside for Las Vegas.

Meaning that Ivey still has a way that is long go before finding a last go-ahead to dispense medical cannabis in Sin City. But as he makes pot-sized bets at the poker table if he can make his way through the various licensing stages, Ivey might end up slinging weed just as prolifically.

Council Separate on Licensing Process

There is a whole lot of controversy over the way in which nevada has handled the pot licensing procedure, though who has more related to procedural questions than anything Ivey or every other potential licensee has done.

Councilman Bob Coffin introduced a motion to postpone the proceedings until after Nevada regulators weigh in on the suitability of each of the candidates week that is next. He worried that making opinions that are public applicants before the state made its own guidelines could possibly lead to lawsuits, and that waiting could permit the city to approach the problem with an ‘unbiased eye.’

But that motion ultimately failed, as a vote in the issue finished in a tie that is 3-3. Councilwoman Lois Tarkanian and councilman Ricki Barlow also voted to postpone the proceedings, while Mayor Carolyn Goodman, wife of infamous ex-mayor Oscar and mother of a applicatant by herself, abstained from the vote.

Among the numerous applicants that were approved were developer James Hammer, restaurant owner Michael Morton, and consultant that is political Thomas. Nuleaf, a Las Vegas-based company that is owned by a group that operates dispensaries in Ca, ended up being denied for a permit.

‘we believe waiting might have made a difference,’ Nuleaf spokesman Bradley Mayer said. ‘We feel confident that their state will find we are a very qualified applicant.’

Ivey Headliner of this 12 Months

That is simply the most recent in a series of headlines made by Ivey which have nothing in connection with his prodigious skills at the poker table.

Probably the biggest headlines have been made in his various cases that are edge-sorting Crockfords together with Borgata. Ivey already lost the Crockfords situation in the united kingdom’s High Court of Justice, costing him over $12 million in winnings. a case that is similar the Atlantic City casino is nevertheless pending, although in that case, it’s the casino that is pursuing recourse to have its payouts returned. Ivey contends that the techniques he found in the games don’t constitute cheating, while the casinos, maybe not interestingly, disagree.

Last Saturday, Ivey also shut straight down the Ivey Poker site, closing operations just 18 months after the Facebook poker program launched. However, the poker legend said that the shut down was just a transition for the product.

South Africa Online Gambling Ban Stirs Debate

South Africa is considering a ban on online gambling, in addition to stronger regulations for land-based wagering, such as electronic bingo terminals like these. (Image: OnlineCasinoArchives.co.za)

South Africa’s government is proposing a ban on a range that is wide of activities, including all forms of online gambling and other activities such as dog racing. That proposition is being discussed by the nationwide Gambling Policy Council, which features members from both the national and provincial governments, as well as the Department of Trade and Industry quick hits slot machines for sale.

In accordance with department officials, the government believes it has the capability to enforce laws on gambling, and that it’s unclear how jobs that are many created by the internet gambling industry. It would also scarcely be an unprecedented move, as numerous other jurisdictions around the world have outlawed online gambling within the past.

Democratic Alliance Favors Regulation Over Ban

But while some government officials had been enthusiastic in regards to the prospect, the thought of an outright ban was highly denounced by the opposition Democratic Alliance.

‘That is really a very, extremely bad decision,’ stated DA trade and industry spokesperson Geordin Hill-Lewis. ‘we fiercely disagree with that view. It’s completely shortsighted to say that it is better for Southern Africans not to ever be allowed to gamble online when there is demand that is patently significant the country to accomplish this. It is for government to facilitate that into the way that is safest possible.’

In other terms, the DA place is that online gambling is better controlled through legislation, rather than an outright ban. a ban that is full Hill-Lewis said, would price far an excessive amount of in resources to enforce.

But Department of Trade and Industry Deputy Director-General Zodwa Ntuli said that the specific circumstances in Southern Africa meant that a ban will be good general public policy. She pointed out that the division’s proposal was made after recognizing that South Africa had a level that is relatively high of gambling and debt compared with numerous countries.

Electronic Bingo Terminals Will Be Limited

In the event that department’s tips had been to become law, it wouldn’t trigger a widespread ban of all gambling tasks in the country, but would rather restrict what would be allowed of the old-fashioned forms of gaming being already contained in South Africa. There would also be further controls put on electronic bingo terminals, which are presently allowed by provincial governments, even though there was no policy that is national the devices.

That conflict caused Trade and Industry Minister Rob Davies to issue a moratorium on any licenses that are further the devices. The new guidelines would notice a cap on the number of machines allowed nationwide. It would also make an effort to get a grip on the ease of access to these machines, with officials saying that gambling really should not be allowed in departmental stores, for instance.

The latest regulations would likewise incorporate a framework for allowing the government to raised oversee the horse rushing industry. While few details were available, it appeared that the most significant changes there would come in the issuing of licenses, a procedure by which the government could impact modification in the industry.

Gambling regulation in South Africa is similar to that regarding the United States and Canada, at least in terms of the interplay between federal and local governments. While the government that is federal national policy, it is up to individual provinces to decide how each will issue licenses and collect revenues from gambling tasks.

Tuesday Massachusetts Casino Repeal Vote Takes Place

Despite long odds, anti-casino forces remain hoping for a triumph in Massachusetts. A ‘yes’ vote means ‘no gambling enterprises’. (Image: Repeal the Casino Deal)

A vote that will either lead to Massachusetts casino repeal or to your matter being put to bed for good is coming on Tuesday, though it would simply take a major upset for anti-casino advocates to get their way on Election Day. Those seeking to defeat casinos are confusingly searching for voters to vote ‘Yes’ on Question 3, an idea that will put end to the 2012 legislation that is allowing the state to license video gaming houses over the state.

According to the survey that is latest by the Western New England University Polling Institute, 59 per cent of likely voters in the state plan to vote ‘No’ in the ballot question, meaning ‘yes’ to legal casinos. Only 35 per cent plan to vote ‘yes,’ in favor of the repeal. Those numbers represent a major gain for pro-casino forces, since a September poll showed just an 11 percent advantage for ‘no’ voters.

Of course, that’s assuming voters don’t get completely bewildered by the unintuitive ‘yes/no’ phrasing of the ballot effort itself.

Religious Voters Support Repeal

The numbers reveal that there’s been some success in efforts by spiritual leaders to get parishioners to oppose the casino law, with regular churchgoers being more inclined to vote ‘yes’ than their non-attending counterparts. But also Catholics who attend mass every week are opposed to repeal with a 17 % margin. In fact, Protestant voters who worship regularly make up about the only demographic that favor repeal, doing this with a 55-45 margin.

Meanwhile, the advertising efforts by casinos and their allies appear to have been very effective. Support for the repeal in Western Massachusetts is reduced notably compared to in prior polls, perhaps because of advertising that touted some great benefits of the planned MGM casino in Springfield.

Battle Over Benefits and Consequences

But while anti-casino advocates may be dealing with long odds on Tuesday, they’re still fighting within the final moments to get their message out. Groups like Repeal the Casino Deal believe that the casinos will offer you very little economic benefit to the folks of Massachusetts, while increasing criminal activity and gambling addiction.

‘ The money isn’t coming to the social people of Massachusetts,’ said Al Cabot, an anti-casino advocate. ‘This is actually cash that’s going from one or two casinos in Connecticut to three casinos in Massachusetts.’

Needless to say, those into the casino industry see things just a bit that is little. According to MGM Springfield President Mike Mathis, his business’s casino shall create tens of thousands of jobs and bring tens of millions of dollars in economic stimulus to town.

‘we have seen what 25 years of no casino may do,’ Mathis stated. ‘we would like a chance.’

Mathis also disputes the idea that casinos would simply be taking money that is already spent in Massachusetts and shifting it to spending at his business’s resort.

‘A third of our customers are coming from Connecticut,’ Mathis said. ‘This idea that cash is dropping through the sky or we’re cannibalizing the local marketplace is just inaccurate.’

Gambling enterprises in Massachusetts: Pre-Election Status

Therefore far, three licenses are granted to construct gambling venues in Massachusetts. Along with the MGM casino in Springfield, Wynn Resorts had been the champion of the more Boston license, beating out a plan that is competing Mohegan Sun at Suffolk Downs in Revere. A license ended up being additionally awarded to Penn National to develop a slots parlor in Plainridge.

While casino opponents may short come up at the polls, simply getting the question on the ballot was one thing of a victory. Although campaigners collected more than enough signatures to put the casino concern to a referendum, Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley originally rejected the question, forcing a showdown in the state’s Supreme Court over whether it would ultimately show up on this season’s ballot.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.